To Brexit or Not

To Brexit or Not

EU Brexit
The article first published in americanthinker.com on 01/20/2019.

 

To understand what’s going on in the UK after the defeat of Theresa May in Commons one needs some background not only on what motivated the Brits to vote to leave the European Union, but more importantly what was it about the EU that they particularly disliked. The first part of it is easy. The English, and it was they who provided the bulk of the ‘leave’ votes, were simply tired of being told what to do by a European Commission that had not been elected by them or anybody else, for that matter. It was a simple matter of sovereignty, especially after the European Commission turned out to be nothing more than a proxy for a new German diktat after Merkel without consulting anyone unilaterally opened the borders of the EU to two million Muslim migrants in 2015.

 

This may have been the proximate cause of the Brexit outcome, but the deeper reasons involved long-held fundamental grievances that had been piling up over many years and finally boiled over. And that had to do with the direction in which the EU is taking Europe. To put it simply, that direction is an unmistakably left-wing course aiming at the creation of a new union of European nations that lacks individual sovereignty and is told what to do by their betters – a kind of democratic Soviet Union, that history tells us is not possible.

 

To be sure, there are many in the UK that share these objectives, from the increasingly socialistic left under Jeremy Corbyn to Scotish nationalists and a rabidly pro-EU mainstream press, but they are still a minority and likely to remain so for the foreseeable future.

 

How we got to that point from the fundamental beliefs of Konrad Adenauer, Alcide de Gasperi and Robert Schumann that economic interdependence would eliminate wars in Europe is another question, but suffice it to say that all three of these European political giants believed in competition and sovereignty, something that nobody in power in Brussels currently endorses.

 

So what are some of the ways in which Europe has taken a wrong turn that turns off the Brits? They are the same that discomfort traditional Europeans that value their sovereignty and traditions and are the same that have given rise to the dreaded ‘populist’ movements across the continent. There are way too many for a think piece to list, from prohibiting cucumbers that don’t have the approved curvature to even more asinine regulations that only bureaucrats that don’t have anything better to do can think of. Two deserve special mention because they are particularly egregious and affect everybody – global warming and GMO.

 

Global warming is behind the European cult of renewable energy. This led in the EU renewable ‘champion’ Germany to prices of kWh paid by households of 35 cents (2017) vs. 11 cents in the US and 22 cents in the UK. How is it possible for German industry not to collapse at those prices? It is possible because the government makes the German consumer subsidize industry at the cost of its own standard of living. It is a gigantic fools errand that it is now coming to an end. In 2019 many of the 29,000 of the highly touted wind turbines in Germany would be nearly 20 years old and run out of subsidies, yet none of them are economically feasible without them and have to be shut down. To add insult to injury, Merkel’s government has engaged in a blatant collusion with Putin  against Eastern Europe by claiming that the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project is strictly ‘commercial.’ None of it has even remotely contributed to the avowed purpose to bring down CO2 emissions, which have been rising since 2009.

 

It is impossible today to walk into a EU super market without being assaulted on all sides by advertisement for non-genetically modified food. This, at a time when non-GMO is rapidly disappearing because science has decided otherwise. In the world’s largest producer of seed stock by far, the United States, the percentage of non-GMO seed is already less than 10 percent and rapidly declining. The EU, all-out propaganda notwithstanding, thus has a clear choice of going GMO or not growing food competitively. It is not difficult to figure out which side will win.

 

So which way is Brexit going to go? There are huge forces arrayed against following the British vote to leave. There is the EU determined to make sure that leaving is neither easy not cheap, less anyone else gets the idea, assorted left-wingers dreaming of socialist paradise and the slavishly like-minded press. They all hope for more of the same. On the other side, seemingly outnumbered, are those that were tired of not being represented, of being told what cucumbers to buy and of imminent doom if they were to dare the powers that be. For the sake of the United Kingdom and, ultimately Europe itself, here is hoping that on March 29, 2019, the EU will be one member less.

 

By Alex Alexiev

Leave a comment

More
Bearish investor Doug Casey bullish on Eastern Europe

Bearish investor Doug Casey bullish on Eastern Europe

Doug Casey, a renowned contrarian investor and global citizen, views the West as collapsing due to excessive growth of government,…
“The Eagle Should Permit the Small Birds to Sing”: The Lessons of Brexit for the East

“The Eagle Should Permit the Small Birds to Sing”: The Lessons of Brexit for the East

The biggest question facing all of Europe at the moment is whether Britain’s protracted exit from the European Union, which…
Going offshore in Eastern Europe — Part 2: the commoditization of citizenship

Going offshore in Eastern Europe — Part 2: the commoditization of citizenship

Putting citizenship up for sale is a controversial endeavor.   Some natural-born citizens of a country might revolt against the…